why did labour lose the 1951 election

By 1947, more than one fifth of British industry had been drawn into public ownership. time of economic downfall- seen to be short lived as by 1952 the prescription charges by Hugh We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Why did Labour lose 1951? - Quora In this essay, I will look at the factors which led to the Labour . What was the Conservatives election slogan in 1951? Having been given such a considerable mandate to rebuild the country in 1945, the Attlee post-war government lost popular support considerably over the next six years. The 1946 National Insurance Act was also a key domestic reform of the Attlee government. {"ad_unit_id":"App_Resource_Leaderboard","width":728,"height":90,"rtype":"MindMap","rmode":"canonical","placement":1,"sizes":"[[[1200, 0], [[728, 90]]], [[0, 0], [[468, 60], [234, 60], [336, 280], [300, 250]]]]","custom":[{"key":"env","value":"production"},{"key":"rtype","value":"MindMap"},{"key":"rmode","value":"canonical"},{"key":"placement","value":1},{"key":"sequence","value":1},{"key":"uauth","value":"f"},{"key":"uadmin","value":"f"},{"key":"ulang","value":"en_us"},{"key":"ucurrency","value":"usd"}]}, GCSE History Social Impact of the Nazi State in 1945, History- Medicine through time key figures, {"ad_unit_id":"App_Resource_Leaderboard","width":728,"height":90,"rtype":"MindMap","rmode":"canonical","placement":2,"sizes":"[[[0, 0], [[970, 250], [970, 90], [728, 90]]]]","custom":[{"key":"env","value":"production"},{"key":"rtype","value":"MindMap"},{"key":"rmode","value":"canonical"},{"key":"placement","value":2},{"key":"sequence","value":1},{"key":"uauth","value":"f"},{"key":"uadmin","value":"f"},{"key":"ulang","value":"en_us"},{"key":"ucurrency","value":"usd"}]}. In opposition to the Conservative Party, it has been the major democratic socialist party in Britain since the early 20th century. years of the The economy's recovery was further hindered by the short-sighted need to remain a world power. Answer (1 of 11): There are books and other commentaries, opinions (web searches will reveal them) that explore this in detail, but here is a personal take. Just by losing a core of middle class voters, Labour lost a great many marginal contests and most particularly in the well-to-do constituencies of southern and south-eastern England. 'consolidation', Division also came as Bevan was resentful in Wiki User 2009-09-25 15:23:48 Study now See answer (1) Copy the main points are: -record on nationalisation and welfare -economic problems which. Why did Clement Attlee lose in 1951? - Quora The new Chancellor Sir Stafford Cripps expected of the country an austere realism which entailed the retention of rationing. There was nothing like the self-destructive trade union protests and strikes of the 1979 'Winter of . Labour would not again form a government until 1964, the question is; what caused people to revert back to supporting the conservatives once again? Labour Fundamentalists including Bevan wanted further reforms, specifically more nationalisation meanwhile Morrison called for party unity. 4.86: $1 to 2.80:$1, Rationing increasingly unpopular with middle classes, Eg. 'Felt like a guinea pig': 90-year-old suburban atomic veteran Indeed, after signing the Munich Agreement, Chamberlain was heralded as a hero: 'saving' the country from another bloody war. It had several effects, all of which were harmful in both the long and short term. socialist the party Chamberlain's actions before the war had indeed lost the Conservatives much respect and had made them look weak to many people who saw Labour as the only reliable alternative. Although Labours promises had brought about hopes and expectations that were simply unachievable, whilst in government Labour had brought about serious change and a number of reforms. how the radical Labour He set in motion key reforms to wipe out the image of the Conservative party being upper class elitists who do not understand the people that had been so prevalent in the last election. Concerns about the permissive society e.g. Paul Addison argues that 1940 was the year when the foundations of political power shifted decisively leftwards for a decade By the autumn of 1942 a major upheaval in public opinion had taken place. People had lost trust in the conservatives and blamed them for Britains military short-comings, and this was important for Labours rise in support. Although there was some tangible degree of divisions within the party over the banality and unradical approach, with many backbenchers urging a return to the early zealousness for national change, it was not this issue which harmed the party most. Although interesting they had little to do with shifting the electorate's opinions, indeed in 1945 both parties' campaigns were largely improvised. This committed the UK government to keeping the value of sterling at a stable rate against the US dollar, and this meant that the governments hands were tied as they sought to address Britains balance of payments deficit by means of international trade. highly controversial and cost Sarah from CollectifbdpHi there, would you like to get such a paper? The population was also swelling, not to mention the return of service men and women from abroad, and the total number of properties in Britain had fallen by over 700,000 due to bomb damage. 1 He belonged to the first intake of students at the Ecole polytechnique in 1794 and went on to become an iron engineer. We provide reliable homework help online and custom college essay service. Just by losing a core of middle class voters, Labour lost a great many marginal contests and most particularly in the well-to-do constituencies of southern and south-eastern England. Gaitskell and Morrison (Deputy Prime Minister) both doubted whether Labour would be able to defeat the Conservatives in 1951, owing to their loss of seats in the 1950 election. Labour's campaign, although not crucial to their success, was better organised, funded and planned than the Conservatives' and, as such, made Labour look strong - in contrast with the Conservatives. Winston Churchill was a very popular speaker. The Labour party had suffered after 10 years in government, and their MPs had begun falling ill, some even dying. Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? support for the party. Winston Churchill Won World War II. So Why Did He Lose the 1945 seats 1950, By changing the timing of the election to be in 1951 rather than The Labour Party, Women, and the Problem of Gender, 1951-1966 the Tories as 'lower than vermin' alienated The party's manifesto was named. Mind Map on Why did Labour lose the 1951 election?, created by alinam on 05/24/2015. gas-1949. ministers to show their political competence, Work of Butler in transforming the For the first time, the government provided a catch-all benefits system which hypothecated a proportion of tax revenue thence to be paid against sickness, elderliness and unemployment to name but three key entitlements. 'Taking their labour and art to the best market': The Political Economy History-UK-BK1-Labour-1951 election | Mind Map Following the 1966 General Election, the Labour Party's Home Policy Committee observed that the party had, "for the first time, obtained a majority of the female vote" and remarked, "it would be very satisfactory if we could retain it." One of the major issues Labour had to face was how to rebuild Britain following the end of the Second World War, it also had to face the decolonisation of the British Empire and the loss of key figures within the party due to age and illness by 1951. This large Parliamentary shift, in the face of an unremarkable swing in the popular vote, can be attributed partly to Labours loss of the middle class vote. Why Did the Labour Government Suffer an Unexpected | Studymode British general election of 2010 - The slow decline of Labour This brought about a little unrest within working class support but it was the effect on middle class attitudes and the cracks opening among the Parliamentary partys support which began to harm electoral credibility. 5 Labour and Conservative Governments, 1964-79 Why did the Conservatives lose the election of 1964? accepting the ideas of NHS and that In the election, Labour suffered considerable losses, but was able to retain a slim majority. This was the fourth of five elections in the twentieth century where a party lost the popular vote, but won the most seats. Yet to limit the debate to these factors neglects the . rather than 0% Indeed, Robert Pearce claims it seems very unlikely indeed that the campaign was crucial, Paul Addison, however, argues that the campaign was important because . The Labour Party, led by Attlee won a landslide victory and gained a majority of 145 seats. The impact of the Petrov Affair will be seen to significantly alter the political landscape of Australia and providing the liberal government under Menzies an opportunity to reconfirm their anti-communist sentiment. social reform and nationalisation. Following Cripps resignation on grounds of ill health, Hugh Gaitskell took over as Chancellor during Attlees second government. Their wartime experience in government was critical in catalysing trust and support for the party and its MPs who had proven themselves. Two cabinet ministers resigned in protest &ndash . The question as to why Labour won the 1945 election has been the source of much in depth study since the period. Evidently, the Conservatives were punished in 1945, when they were lucky to not have been in 1935 and, arguably, if elections had taken place in 1940, Labour may have won. For me, the Attlee government(s) of 1945 - 51, achieved a huge amount, much of which we can still see and experience today, and which we sh. While the more right-wing Gaitsgillites wanted more concentration on an aggressive foreign policy on issues like the cold war. Gaitskell had imposed upon the health service prescription charges for glasses and false teeth, which to Bevan and other NHS idealists represented the betrayal of NHS founding principals. Labour's achievements, or rather what they did not achieve, can be linked as to why they lost: they had arguably successfully set up a welfare state but had also induced an economic crisis. They had beaten the Conservatives by a clear 8% however in 51 they only had a 0.8% lead on the votes, as to why they didn't win after getting more votes one has to examine the first past the post system. This split caused to distinct groups to form within Labour; the Bevanites and the Gaitsgillites. Labour's popularity was also dented by their foreign policy, in granting sovereignty to some of Britain's most successful colonies Labour were seen as dissembling an empire that had taken hundreds of years to attain. The new Chancellor Sir Stafford Cripps expected of the country an austere realism which entailed the retention of rationing. The Labour party had suffered after 10 years in government, and their MPs had begun falling ill, some even dying. To the most left-wing Labour MPs and enthusiasts, this was a betrayal of socialist solidarity; on the other hand, to many more involved with the party this represented subservience to US demands. Economically the Labour government of 45-51 struggled, with the electorate all too aware of he post-war shortages, the continuing rationing, increased taxes, and the general dislike of austerity the feeling of being under the thumb of the Americans.