0720180016 (Dec. 11, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180016.pdf.
Find your nearest EEOC office
Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No.
2020002285 (Apr. Foster B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. This booklet also provides an explanation of the REDRESS program REDRESS, an alternative dispute resolution process, may offer you an opportunity to request mediation in addition to traditional EEO Lacy R. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. Agency defense counsel may assist agency management officials and witnesses in the preparation of their affidavits during the investigative stage but may not instruct officials to make statements that are untrue or make changes to any affidavit without the affiant's approval of such changes; agency defense counsel also may assist agencies in informal resolution talks during the counseling stage so long as counsel suggests, but does not dictate, settlement terms. Of the 3,014 completed investigations, 99.2% were timely. Although the Agency argued that there were "security reasons" for delaying the accommodation, it did not provide any details describing the concerns, it "lost track" of his request for approximately five months, and it failed to respond adequately to his request for a list of Agency-approved software. On July 15, 2022, USPS submitted a spreadsheet to the EEOC Administrative Judge, and also to us as Phase I Class Counsel. The Post Office is unbelievable in their ability to mistreat their workers. 2020002487 (Dec. 29, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_25/2020002487.pdf. Terisa B. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal Nos. Stanton S. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Complainant did not establish an Equal Pay Act violation where he and his female comparator performed substantially different jobs in two different locations, they were supervised under different management chains, the female comparator used more complex technology, and she had been paid at a higher level prior to receiving a lateral transfer. 2019002953 (Jan. 27, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/2019002953.pdf. According to the Commission, there was evidence of at least five incidents over a one year period where the agency failed to accommodate complainant's hearing impairment. shooting in sahuarita arizona; traduction saturn sleeping at last; is bachendorff a good brand; Applying Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1831 (2020), the Commission found that the agency discriminated against complainant on the basis of sexual orientation when it did not select him for any of three supervisory positions; complainant established that the agency's proffered explanation was pretextual.
EEOC finds USPS practiced disability discrimination This policy reaffirms the Postal Service's commitment to providing a work environment free of harassment and supersedes MOP HR-03-14-2019-2. On December 1, 2020, Arbitrator Sharnoff issued a decision confirming Clerk Craft jurisdiction over operation of the Small Parcel Sorting System (This article first appeared in the September/October 2020 issue of theAmerican Postal Workermagazine) Please know that we are fighting for you, just as we have done for over 10 years. Cox filed another EEO complaint of discrimination which is still pending. Sonia B. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, EEOC Appeal No. Keri C. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0720160006 and 0720160007 (Sept. 25, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720160006.0720160007.txt. The EEOC noted that the untimely invoices submitted on appeal did not detail the attorneys hourly rate or clearly identify the services performed by the attorney. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS info@eeoc.gov
0120161068 (Mar. No violation of Equal Pay Act where Agency established that the Agency-wide salary increases and the performance-based salary increase system were gender-neutral factors, were applied consistently, and explain any compensation disparity between Complainant and her male coworkers. 48-1 40-0062-06, the final agency decision (FAD) issued in connection Robin H. v. Environmental Protection Agency, EEOC Appeal No. Brendon L. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No.
Federal Legal Cases Filed by Postal Employees from PostalReporter.com Equal Employment Opportunity ("EEO") complaint with the Postal Service on November 7, 2002. Agency's appeal of Administrative Judge's decision was untimely filed where Agency filed the appeal more than 45 days (including a five-day presumption of receipt) after issuance of the decision; Agency did not show that it received the decision beyond the presumed five days; Agency failed to seek waiver, estoppel, or equitable tolling; and Agency failed to offer adequate justification for an extension of the applicable time period. Sol W. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Washington, DC 20507
EEOC FY 2020 Statistics: EEOC's Recovery on Behalf of Employees 2019004326 (Sept. 30, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019004326.pdf. Bill A. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 5, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/0120180519.pdf. It has come to our attention that a number of people who were Class Members in the Pittman v. USPS class action have been receiving letters from USPS about that settlement process. Sherrie M. v. U.S. Agency's final order adopting Administrative Judge's decision vacated, and case remanded to Agency for reissuance of final order, where Complainant did not receive the AJ's decision and therefore was unable to argue with specificity about the AJ's findings and conclusions that the Agency implemented. The parties ultimately agreed on a $49.9 million settlement for these violations and the first round of payments was accomplished beginning in June of 2020.
usps eeoc settlements 2020 - Pentagram.restaurant The Commission has jurisdiction over complaints alleging discrimination occurring in the course of a dual-status technician's civilian employment in a General Services position. You do what they say, not what they do. 0120180641 (Aug. 6, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/0120180641.pdf. 2020000109 (Oct. 26, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020000109.pdf. 2020001922 (May 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020001922.pdf. Mindy O. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. When a case is dismissed with prejudice in federal court, a complainant may not re-enter the administrative complaint process. by Kirk Angel | Mar 16, 2021 | EEOC, Employment Law, General | 0 comments. 25, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170498.pdf. The AJ certification decision recited evidence that the goal of NRP was to assign work to employees who had an approved compensable injury as determined by the Department of Labor. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. Costs USPS agreed to pay $840,044 for 4,584 pre-complaint settlements, of which 433 were monetary settlements averaging $1,940. 15, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120123215.txt. Where there was no basis to support the Administrative Judge's award of $9,122.50 more than the requested $122,150.00 in attorney's fees, the appellate decision adjusted the award to reflect the actual amount claimed in the fee petitions. Irvin M. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No.
USPS Reaches $17.3M Disability Discrimination Settlement Share sensitive 0120162040 (Apr. 0120170498 (Apr. Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. Generally, to win a retaliation case, you have to show (1) legally protected activity -- of which Ryan had tons, (2) adverse employment action -- and getting fired is clearly "adverse," so Ryan had that, too, and (3) a "causal connection" between the legally protected activity and the adverse employment action (uh-oh). In addition, 10 percent of wrongful termination and discrimination cases result in a $1 million dollar settlement. 2020001428 (Aug. 13, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020001428.pdf. 16, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170582.pdf.
PEN Resources foir Postal Employees USPS Worker Arrested - Retaliation Goes Too Far. n In the left-hand column under "Essential Links," click .
Postal Service Policy on Workplace Harassment - USPS U.S. Postal Service: Further Analysis Could Help Identify Opportunities 0120171870 (Mar.
Activision to pay $18 million settlement over workplace misconduct Postal Service who have been subjected to the National Reassessment Process (NRP) from May 5, 2006 to present, allegedly in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 0120150846 (Nov. 10, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120150846.txt. She further alleged the USPS retaliated against her for prior EEO action from 2005-2006. Complainant entitled to attorney's fees where relief awarded was based on per se reprisal claims that the Administrative Judge sua sponte raised mid-way through the hearing process; attorney's competent representation of Complainant and development of the evidence led directly to the AJ's sua sponte raising of reprisal as a basis. Effective March 26, 2020, the Postal Service reissued its Memorandum of Policy (MOP) HR-03-26-2020-2, Postal Service Policy on Workplace Harassment (see page 1 and page 2 ). Margeret M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 22, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171405.pdf. Wes S. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Lara G. v Postmaster General, EEOC Req.
Employers paid $439M to resolve EEOC discrimination claims in 2020 Washington, DC 20507
The Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider appeals from Peace Corps volunteers and applicants, who have a separate EEO complaint process outside Commission jurisdiction; although Complainant filed her complaint against the State Department, it concerned a Peace Corps volunteer position over which the Commission did not have jurisdiction. Racial slurs, in and of themselves, may be sufficiently severe to constitute a hostile work environment even if the derogatory comments were not aimed at the complainant. 0120123216 (Jan. 8, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120123216.txt. The settlement provided that USPS will pay, in full settlement of all claims in this Case: The total sum of three-million-eight-hundred-fifty-thousand-dollars ($3,850,000) Can I be reinstated to my USPS job now while this relief process is ongoing?
Arbitration Awards & Settlements | American Postal Workers Union Sharon S. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 2019000778 (Nov. 27, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019000778.pdf. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. USPS Settlement An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. Herschel T. v. National Aeronautics and Space Admin., EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC then awarded her an additional $10,000 in non-pecuniary damages. Within the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP), the Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) is responsible for processing claims filed by Postal Service employees.
According to the nonprofit organization ProPublica the EEOC ruled that the NRP illegally discriminated against injured workers by creating a hostile work environment, taking away disability accommodations and revealing workers confidential medical information in 2015 and 2017. 520-2008-00053X; Agency Case No. Colby S. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Labor costs made up 80 percent of the USPS operating costs at the time that the NRP was rolled out.
Current Developments | NRP Class Action 0120172604 (Apr. Iliana S. v. U.S. 2019001468 (June 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019001468.pdf. Thus the Commission limited its award of attorney fees to $1,000 based on an hourly rate of $250 per hour rather than the requested amount of $5,094.73. Permanent Workforce: 622,045 Temporary Workforce: 85,843 Total Workforce: 707,888. Complainant stated a viable claim of harassment based on race and national origin where Complainant alleged that subordinate disparaged Chinese immigrants, mocked Complainant's language and communication skills, insinuated that Complainant was un-American, and interfered with work performance. It remains to be seen whether the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in 2020 that discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is prohibited sex discrimination will have an impact on total LGBTQ-based sex discrimination charges filed.. Thersa E. v. U.S. I know a Ross R. v. Dept of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Alena C. v. Dep't of State, EEOC Appeal No. The Agency discriminated against Complainant based on his disability when it failed to provide him with a reasonable accommodation in a timely manner and when it delayed his promotion. Allegations of retaliation by IRS Examiner and Taxpayer Advocate properly dismissed for failure to state a claim where actions at issue occurred to Complainant as a taxpayer, not as a former employee, and allegations constituted a collateral attack on the tax adjudication process. The complainant, a federal employee at the United States Postal Service, filed an EEO complaint against the USPS. IV. The Agency subjected Complainant to adverse treatment based on protected EEO activity when the office director informed Complainant's detail supervisor that Complainant was engaged in settlement discussions for an EEO complaint. If you agree to settle a complaint based on one or more stipulations, these must be written down, agreed on, and signed both by you and a management designee.
Retaliation, EEOC, Settlement | JD Supra Former USPS workers in the NRP class action suit allege that they were discriminated against after showing proof that they had been injured at work.
Joshua F. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Dismissal of hearing request not warranted where any problems concerning the adequacy of Complainant's discovery responses could have been cured well before the discovery period ended, failure to issue a show-cause order deprived Complainant of the opportunity to respond to Agency's motions for sanctions, and Commission could not independently assess adequacy of Complainant's responses to Agency's discovery requests because the requests and responses were missing from the record. Summary judgment in favor of Agency inappropriate where AJ abused her discretion in denying Complainant's Motion to Compel and there were genuine issues of material fact concerning whether Agency had a policy or practice of not accommodating pregnant workers while accommodating other categories of workers. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) You can obtain complete copies of the EEO laws and 29 CFR 1614 on the Internet at www.eeoc.gov. Calvin D. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Petition No. Watch David Norths remarks commemorating 25 years of the World Socialist Web Site and donate today. All rights reserved.
However, I will say this the Postal Service is run by some very hateful uncaring people who have no business being in Management. Harriet M. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuitthat Eclipse Advantage, Inc., violated federal law by subjecting an African-American employee to racial discrimination and retaliation at its Aldi Food Service warehouse in Hinckley, Ohio. [9] These numbers reflect an increase in the percentage of Title VII settlements compared to 2016-2019. The class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of 41,000 past and current USPS workers whose hours may have been restricted because of permanent disabilities from 2000-2012. Moreover, some EEO complaints dated back as far as 2001. If there is not enough evidence to hold the employer liable, the victim could end up with nothing. While the parties may voluntarily settle a claim early in the process or wait until the EEOC completes . Agency discriminated against Complainant on the bases of race and sex when her supervisor gave her a negative job reference that included unfounded critical statements about Complainant; evidence supported Complainant's assertion that supervisor did not want Complainant, a Hispanic woman, potentially to serve as the supervisor's superior. Carroll R. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No.
Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit 2019004084 (Sept. 15, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019004084.pdf. It is by no accident that our craft is taking positive strides. Malinda F. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. Agency discriminatorily denied Complainant's religious-accommodation request for an exemption from the requirement that employees carry a cannister of pepper spray where it was undisputed that Complainant, a chaplain, had a bona fide religious belief that prevented him from carrying the spray; Agency did not show that exempting one employee, out of approximately 300 employees, from the requirement would have been an undue hardship; and there was no evidence that Agency explored a lateral transfer to a different facility or any other alternative accommodation. 0120182764 (June 23, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/0120182764.pdf. Requiring Complainant to seek assistance in opening doors from security guards and coworkers did not provide her with an effective accommodation; Agency's eventual installation of automatic doors demonstrated that this accommodation was not an undue hardship. The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients' relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. All Rights Reserved, Disclaimer| Site Map| Privacy Policy |Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters, EEOC Awards $165,000 in Compensatory Damages, Adverse Action Not Permitted for Use of Approved Leave, Adverse Inference for Failure to Produce Documents, Agency Liable for Actions of Subordinate Employee, Agency Rationale Found to Be Pretext for Bias, Arbitral Review of Adverse Actions, Part 1, Attorney Fees Awarded Where Penalty Mitigated, Award Increased in Discrimination Finding, Benefit of Doubt when Representing Oneself, Board Clarifies Jurisdiction for Disabled Veterans, Career Intern Program Violates Veterans Preference, Claim against Agency by IPA Employee Allowed, Claim for Damages and Fees Gets Second Look, Complainants Role in EEO Investigation Part 2, Constructive Notice Bars Summary Judgment, Court Finds No Adverse Employment Action or Reprisal, Court Remands Case for Review of Suggestion Award, Court Rules Against Former Spouse Survivor Annuity, Definition of Disability under the Rehabilitation Act, Disability Discrimination by State Department, Disability Retirement and Discrimination Claims, Discrimination Due to Age, Union Activities, EEO Representative Has Viable Claim of Retaliation, EEOC Awards Substantial Compensatory Damages, EEOC Denies Agencys Request for Reconsideration, EEOC Sustains Discrimination Claim of FAA Employee, Employee Not Entitled to Accommodation for Spouse, Employee Wins at EEOC after Decade-Long Fight, Equal Pay Act Plaintiffs Must Prove Sex Discrimination, Failure to Comply with Law Judges Orders, Failure to Reassign Violates Rehabilitation Act, FEGLI Beneficiary Designation Trumps State Law, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination, Part 1, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination, Part 2, Going Straight to Court with EEO Complaint, Harassment Based on Perceived Sexual Orientation, Hearing Ordered in Involuntary Resignation Case, Hostile Work Environment and Compensation Claims, Hostile Work Environment Harassment Based on Gender, Importance of Impartial Investigations Stressed, Jurisdiction Argument after Delay in Appeal, Lateral Transfer Can be Adverse Job Action, Mixed Motives in Age Discrimination Cases, Modification of Work Schedule as Reasonable Accommodation, MSPB Applies Ruling Limiting Appeal Rights, MSPB Jurisdiction Over Newer FAA Employees, MSPB May Review OPM Suitability Determinations, MSPB Mitigates Penalty for Hatch Act Violation, MSPB Upholds Former Park Police Chiefs Removal, MSPB Upholds Removal for False Medal Claim, New Decision on Management-Directed Reassignment, NSPS Cant Impose New Probationary Period, Performance Improvement Plan Not an Adverse Action, Physician Protected Under Whistleblower Law, Pre-Enactment USERRA Jurisdiction Affirmed By Federal Circuit, Protections for Legislative Branch Employees, Reassignment of Harassment Victim Reversed, Recommended Changes to EEOC Regulations and Procedures, Resignation Reversed Due to Misinformation, Retaliation Not Covered in Age Discrimination Case, Revocation of Accommodation may be Discriminatory, Sleep Impairment a Disability Under Rehabilitation Act, Suit against Manager in Personal Capacity, Supervisors Comments Could Have Chilling Effect, Supporting a Hostile Work Environment Claim, Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Cats Paw Theory, Supreme Court Simplifies Mixed Case Appeals, Survivor Lacks Standing to Bring EEO Claim, Telecommuting as Reasonable Accommodation, Temporary Demotion States Cause of Action, Threat of Discipline Found to be Reprisal, Tolling of Deadlines for Filing Veterans Preference Complaints, TSA Not Immune To Rehabilitation Act Claims, TSA Screener Applicants Exempt from Rehabilitation Act, U.S. District Court Denies Summary Judgment, Unionists Access to Agency System Upheld, Untimely Disability Retirement Application, Whistleblower Compensation Provision Not Retroactive, Whistleblower Legislation Advances in Congress, Whistleblower Reprisal Found, Relief Ordered. Postal Service (USPS) has agreed to pay nearly $17.3 million to settle allegations that the agency discriminated against employees with disabilities. The EEOC ordered the Postal Service to notify each class member, within 10 calendar days, of the EEOC decision. 20, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171870.pdf. Patricia W. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180736.pdf. The EEOC recently awarded $165,000 in non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering to an employee of the U.S. She alleged discrimination based on race, national origin, and sex. 2020001154 (Apr. * EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006. We notified the Judge about this, and argued that this is yet another reason to move this process toward a quick resolution. The Administrative Judge erred when, in the absence of an order, he sanctioned the Agency for its failure to complete the EEO investigation in a timely manner by issuing a default judgment in favor of Complainant. Agency erroneously dismissed complaint for failure to cooperate; the name of the alleged discriminating official and the time frame during which the alleged discrimination occurred constituted sufficient information for the Agency to complete its investigation without an affidavit from Complainant.
Postal Service Workplace Violence Program - USPS Office of Inspector 1-800-669-6820 (TTY)
In Hopes of Finally Settling Cases, EEOC Revises Process 20, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170604.pdf. Here are answers to some questions that have been presented by a number of the class members: What if I move or change my contact information? The settlement directed the Postal Service to pay $44.8 million directly to clerks and establish an escrow of $11.2 million to be disbursed in a manner determined by the union. 0720150002 (Sept. 25, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720150002.txt. Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when it did not provide Complainant with adequate equipment and unreasonably delayed the provision of assistive technology, software, and training to support her accommodation of full-time telework; performance counseling memorandum and placement on performance improvement plan for performance issues directly resulted from Agency's failure to provide Complainant with adequate technologies required to telework effectively. 2019003663 (Aug. 22, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019003663.pdf. 0120182601 (Nov. 8, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182601.pdf.
USPS employee claims of discrimination and retaliation not sufficiently 0120180568 (Apr. And the Unions are bed partners with Management. Before such hearing was held, plaintiff Case 1:03-cv-01987-EGS Document 25 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 19 (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) On December 1, 2020, Arbitrator Sharnoff issued a decision confirming Clerk Craft jurisdiction over operation of the Small Parcel Sorting System. 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171406.pdf. In January 2016, the Postal Service paid $40.2 million to employees; however, it subsequently notified the APWU of errors in these initial payments. Jordon S. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120180917 (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180917.pdf. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that Complainant, who held a GS-14 position, did not establish that her work was substantially equal to that of GS-15 male employees; Complainant did not have the same responsibilities as her comparators because she was not a supervisor, did not have budget authority, did not speak for the Agency the way higher-level employees did, and did not have the technical expertise of higher-level employees. The reissued Postal Service's Policy on Workplace Harassment is available on the Postal Service PolicyNet website: n Go to blue.usps.gov. 2020003134 (Oct. 15, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_19/2020003134.pdf.
Settlement Agreements for EEO Complaints - Office of Resolution 2019002318 (Apr. Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed. Jazmine F. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No.
How to Negotiate an EEO Discrimination Settlement 0120180736 (Aug. 30. Eleni M. v. Dep't of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. Agency engaged in per se reprisal when, at the direction of the attorney representing the Agency in Complainants prior EEO complaint, it sent him correspondence requesting the name of his treating physician, asked him to sign a medical release, and proposed conducting a fitness-for-duty examination; the attorney instigated the actions based on statements that Complainant made in the prior EEO proceeding.